Fragmented sources
Critical information is distributed across systems without a reliable integration model.
SourcesData Architecture
Reformeta designs data foundations that make integration, analytics and future change easier to understand—not harder to maintain.
Problem signals
A dashboard may be wrong because the metric is inconsistent. Integration may be slow because ownership is unclear. A warehouse may become fragile because it grew without an explicit model. We start with the symptom and trace it back to structure.
Critical information is distributed across systems without a reliable integration model.
SourcesTeams calculate the same business concept differently and trust erodes downstream.
DefinitionsChanges in one source repeatedly break hand-built or tightly coupled integrations.
PipelinesBusiness rules are repeated across ETL, reports and spreadsheets with no clear authority.
LogicNo one can easily answer who owns a data domain, definition or source of truth.
OwnershipNew tables and pipelines accumulate faster than the architecture can explain them.
StructureWhat we do
We focus on architecture that remains understandable as sources, reporting needs and technology choices change.
Logical and physical structures aligned to analytical needs and operating constraints.
Reusable fact, dimension and semantic structures designed around business meaning.
Clear movement, transformation and ownership patterns across source and target systems.
Structures that support performance, integrity, maintainability and future change.
Architecture decisions spanning warehouses, analytical stores, integration and delivery layers.
Practical stewardship, ownership and design conventions that keep data usable over time.
Approach
Architecture is useful when each decision makes the next one easier to reason about.
Map sources, users, decisions, constraints and failure points.
Define business meaning, grain, relationships and durable structures.
Design how data moves, changes and reconciles across boundaries.
Clarify authority, ownership, definitions and change expectations.
Expose data in forms analytics and operational systems can trust.
Typical outcomes
The goal is not a prettier architecture diagram. It is a data environment where people can understand what a number means, where it came from and how safely the system can change.
Reporting and decision layers inherit clearer, more stable foundations.
Shared structures reduce competing calculations and one-off transformations.
Teams can identify the authority for important sources and definitions.
New reporting needs build on governed structures rather than restart from scratch.
Dependencies and interfaces are easier to understand before modifying the system.
Tell us where it’s breaking down. We’ll start there.